![]() ![]() I can see why, but that might be an oversight. You commented that prompts do not come across. You will have to amend your Bibliography definitions to include only source level fields. There is no workaround, as it is a design limitation. Footnotes relate to individual citations, but the Bibliography is a list of the master sources, not every single citation, otherwise it is just repeating the footnotes. Personally, I think the FH implementation is more accurate. They ARE permitted in the Footnote and Short Footnote definitions, so Mike's comment was only partly correct. RM permits Citation level fields in the Bibliography, but FH does not. I've had a look at another example of an imported RM Source Template, and I understand what is happening.Īlthough FH and RM source templates are very similar, there is one key difference between them. If you want to use the template in a new project, you have to create a definition file using the Create Source Template Defintions plugin, which is downloaded from the Plugin Store.ĭoes that solve your immediate issue? There is lots more that could be said on Facts, Sources and Templates, but it's best taken one step at a time, as it can be a bit overwhelming for new users.Īdded in edit - I have edited this post a couple of times to hopefully improve clarity, as it is a complex topic. You can create a source from the template in your existing project without creating a definition file. If this tab is not visible, select Tools > Preferences > Records Window, and change the display option from the default of "Always hide" to "Always show". To view the templates, see the "Source Templates" tab of the Records Window. ![]() So at the moment, all your templates are in the project, but cannot be used in other projects. When FH imports an RM file, it imports all the existing templated sources and their templates, but does NOT create the template definitions. ![]() Before you can create a new source template for use in your project, the definition has to be imported into the project. FH has a different method, which is more complex, but a lot more efficient once you get your head around how it works.Īt the top level, there is a template "definition", and these are collected into various "Collections", such as Essentials and Advanced, which are stored at the system level rather than being associated with any particular project. RM stores all its templates in each database file, so your existing file will contain all the hundreds of built-in templates, even though you don't use them. However, they are managed differently in the two apps. FH Templated Sources are very similar in design and concept to those in RM (probably no coincidence.). No - that manages existing Collection Definitions, but the issue here is that there is no Definition defined.Ī short background introduction is necessary to understand what is happening here. I'm sure I've missed something as I've searched for a solution but haven't had any luck.īTW, I can see a "collection" called "RootsMagic Import" when I go to an individual's "Facts" > "Add Citation." However, I can't find that collection elsewhere and even when I edit a template and change the "Collection" to "Simple Citations" it doesn't show up. I was able to create a new "Collection" (which I call, of course, "Simple Citations") by cloning "Essentials" and deleting all of the templates in the cloned version but I can't find a way to import the templates I created from RootsMagic. Anyway, that's a story for another day.Īs I've searched the help files for FH and also contacted tech support (they provided links to some good information), I can't see how to add my imported templates to a "collection" ("Essentials" and "Advanced" come with FH). This includes custom templates for my approach to citing sources, "Simple Citations":, which I created about ten years ago in response to the lack of a standardized approach to citing sources and my strong belief that "Evidence Explained" is an absolute mess. Based on what I'm seeing in FH, I'm strongly considering making the "big switch" from RM to FH.Īnyway, I'm still playing with FH and it was very simple to import (a test) file from RM - it appears as if everything transferred over very well. So far, I am VERY impressed with FH (and continue to be disappointed with RM - which seems to have simply gone the wrong direction, especially with RM8). Hi all, while I'm new to FH, I'm a very long-time user of RootsMagic and have just found FH.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |